AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 1462.8x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 11804
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3359
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 4193 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 8 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 248 | 250 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 224.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390 X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
