AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 320
- 10.4x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 353 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 20 | M96 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 496 | 493 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |