AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon Pro 575

AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 723 MHz
Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Around 52% better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34797 vs 26865
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.154 vs 65.777
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1090.128 vs 820.138
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 7.142
Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 vs 68.754
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 vs 386.418
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 vs 2045
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3144
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 vs 2045
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3144

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 23 November 2014
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 723 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	34797 vs 26865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154 vs 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128 vs 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88 vs 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349 vs 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686 vs 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3144

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34797

26865

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

86.154

65.777

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1090.128

820.138

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.88

7.142

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

98.349

68.754

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

539.686

386.418

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

2045

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3144

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

2045

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3144

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Geekbench - OpenCL	34797	26865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154	65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128	820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88	7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349	68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686	386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814	2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814	2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3144
PassMark - G3D Mark		5150
PassMark - G2D Mark		832

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Polaris 20	Amethyst
Launch date	5 June 2017	23 November 2014
Place in performance rating	496	498
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Technical info
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	723 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops	2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	2048
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	5,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	Not Listed
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore