AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 723 MHz
  • Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
  • Around 52% better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34797 vs 26942
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.154 vs 65.777
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1090.128 vs 820.138
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 7.142
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 vs 68.754
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 vs 386.418
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3144
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 vs 2045
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3144
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 23 November 2014
Core clock speed 1096 MHz vs 723 MHz
Texture fill rate 140.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 4,506 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 34797 vs 26942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 86.154 vs 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1090.128 vs 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88 vs 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.349 vs 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 539.686 vs 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2814 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2814 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3144

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
34797
26942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
86.154
65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1090.128
820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.88
7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
98.349
68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
539.686
386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2814
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2814
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3144
Name AMD Radeon Pro 575 AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Geekbench - OpenCL 34797 26942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 86.154 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1090.128 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.349 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 539.686 386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2814 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9613
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2814 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3144
PassMark - G3D Mark 5150
PassMark - G2D Mark 832

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 575 AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Polaris 20 Amethyst
Launch date 5 June 2017 23 November 2014
Place in performance rating 497 499
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 1096 MHz 723 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,506 gflops 2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 2048
Texture fill rate 140.8 GTexel / s 92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 5,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) Not Listed
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 217.6 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 Not Listed
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore