AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 9743.1x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 5 May 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35084 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 266 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 398 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 20 | M96 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 397 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 514 million |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |