AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 908.7x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 vs 33787
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 9983
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 9983
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3458 vs 2443
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3458 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 4 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 vs 33787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 | 33787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1674 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 389 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | 32 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 5,700 million |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |