AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 575X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
668.1x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 vs 28360
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 10021
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 10021

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 March 2019 vs 7 November 2013
Texture fill rate	140.3 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	35017 vs 28360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11237 vs 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11237 vs 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3458
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3458

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 2048
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3699 vs 3458
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3699 vs 3458

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35017

28360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11237

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11237

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3458

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3458

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3342

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL	35017	28360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11237	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11237	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3458	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3458	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3342
PassMark - G3D Mark		9457
PassMark - G2D Mark		632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3390

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Polaris 20	GK110B
Launch date	18 March 2019	7 November 2013
Place in performance rating	391	393
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		14.80
Technical info
Compute units	32
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	280.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.489 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.489 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2880
Pixel fill rate	35.07 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	140.3 GTexel/s	210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5700 million	7,080 million
Boost clock speed		928 MHz
Core clock speed		875 MHz
CUDA cores		2880
Floating-point performance		5,345 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 8-pin and one 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB/s	336 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		7.0 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA