AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 996x better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 767
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40265 vs 39028
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1206.829 vs 1022.932
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.88 vs 9.235
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 84.034
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40265 vs 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 84.034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 999.8x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6780 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 7753
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 109.521
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 511.984
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 10113
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2900
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 10113
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 7753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 2900 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40265 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 341 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB / s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |