AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1344
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 5427
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 694
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 8276
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 8276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 vs 8276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 2900
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 2900
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | 694 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 322 | 321 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
