AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3719
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3719
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3373
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3373
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 973 vs 525
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22313 vs 12258
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16162 vs 13220
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16162 vs 13220
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126207 vs 61570
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 vs 12258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 vs 13220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126207 vs 61570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 973 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 22313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 3373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | 126207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 12 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 61 | 76 |
Type | Server | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 60 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |