NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and AMD Radeon Pro V520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 2190 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2430 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 311.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- Around 89% higher pipelines: 4352 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129978 vs 62815
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1073 vs 525
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22882 vs 12258
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4352 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129978 vs 62815 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1073 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22882 vs 12258 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro V520
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon Pro V520 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129978 | 62815 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1073 | 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22882 | 12258 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Navi 12 |
Launch date | 2023 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 70 | 68 |
Type | Server | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4352 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 102.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 230.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compute units | 36 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |