AMD Radeon Pro VII vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro VII and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1138 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1301 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
Launch date | 13 May 2020 vs 1 June 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1138 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1301 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Name | AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89937 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 May 2020 | 1 June 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1899 | |
Place in performance rating | 192 | 134 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1301 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 6.528 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.11 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.06 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 408 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm (12 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 |