AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 401
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 401 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 8870
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 8870
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3586
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3586
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30399 vs 22421
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7835 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30399 vs 22421 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7835 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 30399 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 401 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 7835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 12 | GP106 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 367 | 364 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |