AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 970 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8870 vs 7635
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8870 vs 7635
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 vs 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 vs 7635 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3586
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3586
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 22421
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 585
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6153 vs 4809
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3586 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 22421 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 585 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 76397 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 6153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Vega 12 | Antigua |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 360 | 373 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $264.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 970 MHz |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
ATIFireGL V8600
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
