AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 902 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 536
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 23 July 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 536 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 8870
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3586
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23926 vs 22421
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8040 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23926 vs 22421 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8040 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 23926 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 536 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 8040 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Vega 12 | GK110B |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 370 | 372 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 902 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2880 | |
Texture fill rate | 216.5 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |