AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.4x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 1177.4x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 12 GTexel / s billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB
• 47.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11289 vs 236
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 788 vs 653

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2

• 86.2x lower typical power consumption: 145 Watt vs 12500 million
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11289 236
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	788 653

Compare specifications (specs)