AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 722.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 1729.558
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3709
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3353
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3709
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 1729.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 11300
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 784
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71252 vs 53826
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 142.691 vs 135.416
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 883.876
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 11925
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 11925
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 12500 million |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 vs 11300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 vs 53826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 vs 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 vs 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 vs 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 vs 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 vs 11925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 12920 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 797 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53826 | 71252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 1396.172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Greenland | Vega 10 |
| GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 237 | 240 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 250 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
