AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 41.7x lower typical power consumption: 300 W vs 12500 million
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 53864
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W vs 12500 million |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 53864 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3739
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3739
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3739 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 53864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3947 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Navi 21 | Greenland |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 232 | 230 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Quad-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |