AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 9172.9x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 4620
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 4620
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 708
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 3368
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 4620 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 3368 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3713
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3713
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3359
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 18191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 18191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Saturn |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 161 | 341 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |