AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 130.7
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 2361.73
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 13.641
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 135.462
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 774.974
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3463
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3463
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 vs 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 774.974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU102 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $6,299 |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 112 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |