AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 130.7
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 2361.73
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 13.641
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 135.462
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 774.974
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3463
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $6,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 112 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
