AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and AMD Radeon Pro V520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 81% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15596 vs 12258
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 983 vs 525
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72678 vs 62815
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 13220
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 37642
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 13220
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 37642
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15596 vs 12258 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 vs 525 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72678 vs 62815 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 37642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 37642 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 15778
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 15778
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 15778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 15778 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro V520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro V520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15596 | 12258 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 525 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72678 | 62815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 16807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 37642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 16807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 37642 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 12 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 65 | 66 |
Type | Server | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 102.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 230.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |