AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

  • Around 40% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1575 MHz
  • Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1770 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 290 Watt
  • Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 8897
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 8897
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 8004
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 8004
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 1575 MHz
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 290 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 vs 8897
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 vs 8897
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 vs 8004
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 vs 8004

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

  • Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
  • 3.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1792
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 1032
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23682 vs 15919
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 20826
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 20826
  • Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138752 vs 70080
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 339.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines 6144 vs 1792
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1052 vs 1032
PassMark - G3D Mark 23682 vs 15919
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 31420 vs 20826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 31420 vs 20826
Geekbench - OpenCL 138752 vs 70080

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1032
1052
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15919
23682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
31420
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
31420
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
8897
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
8897
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
8004
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
8004
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
70080
138752
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark 1032 1052
PassMark - G3D Mark 15919 23682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20826 31420
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20826 31420
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 8897
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 8897
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 8004
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 8004
Geekbench - OpenCL 70080 138752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 342.287
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 42.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 146.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1807.647
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 14948

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 23 GA104
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 31 May 2021
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $599
Place in performance rating 38 56
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 1770 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 1575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS 21.75 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 6144
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s 169.9 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 339.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 290 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 17400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches) 267 mm, 10.5 inches
Recommended system power (PSU) 300 Watt 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 12-pin
Width 112 mm, 4.4 inches

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 608.3 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X