AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 8897
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 8004
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 8897
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 8004
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 290 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 8004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 8004 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1792
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23581 vs 15596
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 vs 983
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137786 vs 72678
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 vs 270.025
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 20.735
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 vs 135.303
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1054.582
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 20826
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 20826
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 1792 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23581 vs 15596 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 vs 983 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137786 vs 72678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 vs 270.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 20.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 vs 135.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1054.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 20826 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15596 | 23581 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 1047 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72678 | 137786 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 1807.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 8004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 8004 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 65 | 62 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 290 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX A5500 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
