NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon Pro W6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19038 vs 15662
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 113038 vs 72764
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19038 vs 15662 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 113038 vs 72764 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 647
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 266.4 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 647 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 647 | 989 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19038 | 15662 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 113038 | 72764 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD104 | Navi 23 |
| Place in performance rating | 67 | 65 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2903 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 106.6 GPixel/s | 185.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 266.4 GTexel/s | 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Single-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
