AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19814 vs 19560
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 115519
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 23 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 923 vs 920 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19814 vs 19560 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 vs 115519 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 450 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 20988
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 20988
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 20988 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 923 | 920 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19814 | 19560 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 115519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 116 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |