AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 817 MHz
  • Around 96% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1282 MHz
  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 589
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 13387
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 79058
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021
Core clock speed 2075 MHz vs 817 MHz
Boost clock speed 2507 MHz vs 1282 MHz
Texture fill rate 601.7 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 936 vs 589
PassMark - G3D Mark 19881 vs 13387
Geekbench - OpenCL 131707 vs 79058

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

  • 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 450 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 20988
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 20988
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3357
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 450 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21278 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21278 vs 20988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8913 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8913 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8054 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8054 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
936
589
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19881
13387
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
21278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
21278
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
8054
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
8054
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
131707
79058
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark 936 589
PassMark - G3D Mark 19881 13387
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20988 21278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20988 21278
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 8913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 8913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 8054
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 8054
Geekbench - OpenCL 131707 79058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 339.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3898.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 27.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 155.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1167.569
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8234

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 21 GA106
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 12 Jan 2021
Launch price (MSRP) $2249
Place in performance rating 108 130
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2507 MHz 1282 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 2075 MHz 817 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.25 TFLOPS 9.846 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 3840
Pixel fill rate 240.7 GPixel/s 61.54 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 601.7 GTexel/s 153.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 450 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 12000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort Portable Device Dependent
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 50 mm (2 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.2 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 192 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready