AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 601.7 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- 2.3x more pipelines: 8704 vs 3840
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 450 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 934
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25320 vs 19919
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 20988
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 20988
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168014 vs 131707
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 450 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 934 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25320 vs 19919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 20988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 20988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 168014 vs 131707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 1041 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19919 | 25320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | 168014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 21 | GA102 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 52 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |