AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2239.6x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 141178 vs 67658
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 2391
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 1 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 307.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 141178 vs 67658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 2391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 300 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 300 W |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 141178 | 67658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 2391 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3992.429 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Greenland |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 1 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 249 | 252 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Quad-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |