AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- 1872.6x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 62287
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 3699
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 3699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 13 September 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 24 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 62287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 W
- 5x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 W |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 62287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3699 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12267 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 13 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 234 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |