AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 63% better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9309 vs 8319
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9309 vs 8319
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2017 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed 1188 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate 179.0 GTexel / s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 5,728 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9309 vs 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9309 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

  • Around 8% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 2304
  • Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3716
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3716
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3358
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3358
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2496 vs 2304
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7337 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7337 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10873 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10873 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9309
8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9309
8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
10873
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile NVIDIA Tesla K20m
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9309 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9309 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 10873
PassMark - G3D Mark 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark 210
Geekbench - OpenCL 16085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Ellesmere GK110
Launch date 1 March 2017 5 January 2013
Place in performance rating 417 419
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,199

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1243 MHz
Core clock speed 1188 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 5,728 gflops 3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2304 2496
Texture fill rate 179.0 GTexel / s 146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 5200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5