AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7825 vs 5214
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 658
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.834 vs 44.481
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.152 vs 8.536
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 24 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7825 vs 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 vs 658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 vs 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 vs 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 vs 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 vs 470.237 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 11.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2304
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 5,728 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 105.263
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 179.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2304 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops vs 5,728 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 vs 105.263 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7825 | 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38420 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | 125.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 | 470.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Malta |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 24 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 329 | 332 |
Price now | $539.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB / s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |