AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 5,120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 801 vs 792
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 5,120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 vs 792 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8893 vs 7792
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43907 vs 39388
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 120.267 vs 115.834
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 1987.633
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.097 vs 10.152
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 vs 105.263
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.381 vs 597.677
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3575
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3575
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8893 vs 7792 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43907 vs 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 vs 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 vs 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 vs 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 vs 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3347 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7792 | 8893 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 | 792 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39388 | 43907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | 3164.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | 116.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 | 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 957 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | Grenada |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $329 |
| Place in performance rating | 320 | 317 |
| Price now | $539.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 5,120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 275 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
