AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1344
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7816 vs 5427
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 vs 694
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 8276
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 8276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 25 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7816 vs 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 vs 8276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3575
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3575
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3347 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7816 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Ellesmere | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 25 August 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 318 | 320 |
Price now | $539.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |