NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 716.2x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 7811
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 39388
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 115.834
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 10.152
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3575
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3575
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 10 November 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 vs 7811 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 vs 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 vs 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 vs 10.152 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 360
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1919.95
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 94.964
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 492.867
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 vs 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 vs 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 vs 492.867 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 7811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 797 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 | 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 10 November 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 315 | 316 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Price now | $539.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelArc A380
