AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.88 vs 13.097
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 11 June 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 vs 13.097 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 267 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 342 vs 310
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 99 vs 94
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1568
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 3.343
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 106.771
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 vs 0.35
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 8.234
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 701 vs 587
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 750
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 1745
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 701 vs 587
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 750
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 267 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 204.8 gflops vs 153.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 vs 310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 vs 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 1568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 vs 3.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 vs 106.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 vs 0.35 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 vs 8.234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 vs 1745 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 310 | 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 99 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1568 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.343 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 106.771 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.234 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 | 1811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Beema | Beema |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1609 | 1540 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 267 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 930 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |