AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and AMD Radeon Sky 900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 1654
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 1654

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 900

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 329.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• 28x more pipelines: 3584 vs 128
• 33.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 204.8 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 900

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1654

Compare specifications (specs)