AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 92.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 336 vs 159
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 99 vs 28
- 181.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 10
- 181.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 10
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 204.8 gflops vs 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 336 vs 159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 vs 28 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 vs 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 vs 10 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1728 vs 1338
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1728 vs 1338
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1728 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1728 vs 1338 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 336 | 159 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 | 28 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | 1728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | 10 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | 1728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 | 10 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Beema | G84 |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1548 | 1545 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 204.8 gflops | 92.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.4 GTexel / s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |