AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GRID K340
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and NVIDIA GRID K340 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 11.8x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K340
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 82.8x more texture fill rate: 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 4x 384 vs 80
- 28.1x better floating-point performance: 4x 729.6 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1066 MHz
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 729.6 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1066 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K340
Name | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K340 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | NVIDIA GRID K340 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cedar | GK107 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1584 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 4x 729.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 4x 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | 4x 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 4x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |