NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 631 vs 148
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 110
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 895 vs 337
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 895 vs 337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 vs 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 vs 110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 vs 337 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 1066 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 2224
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 583 vs 280
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1094 vs 519
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 583 vs 280
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1094 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 vs 2224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 583 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1094 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 583 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1094 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 2761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 1094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK208B | Cedar |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1590 | 1592 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 8.528 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1066 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |