AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 80 vs 32
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 57
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 148 vs 137

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

• Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1066 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1465 vs 1094
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1465 vs 1094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	111 57
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	148 137
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1465
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1465

Compare specifications (specs)