AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and NVIDIA NVS 310 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 523 MHz
  • Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
  • Around 4% better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 882
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 26 June 2012
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
Pipelines 80 vs 48
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 vs 882

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310

  • Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1066 MHz
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 111
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 249 vs 148
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 431 vs 337
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 431 vs 337
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 918 vs 583
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 918 vs 583
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1229 vs 1094
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1229 vs 1094
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz vs 1066 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 178 vs 111
PassMark - G3D Mark 249 vs 148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 431 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 431 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 918 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 918 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1229 vs 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1229 vs 1094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 310

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
111
178
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
148
249
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2761
882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
918
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
1229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
1229
Name AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM NVIDIA NVS 310
PassMark - G2D Mark 111 178
PassMark - G3D Mark 148 249
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 337 431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 337 431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 583 918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 583 918
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1094 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1094 1229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 76.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 4.974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.835

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM NVIDIA NVS 310

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi 2.0
Code name Cedar GF119
Launch date 21 December 2013 26 June 2012
Place in performance rating 1583 1586
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $159

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz 523 MHz
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 100.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 80 48
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s 4.184 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm 156 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 8.528 GB / s 14 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1066 MHz 1750 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3