AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and NVIDIA NVS 310 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 523 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 881
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 26 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 vs 881 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1066 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 111
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 251 vs 148
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 431 vs 337
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 431 vs 337
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 918 vs 583
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 918 vs 583
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1229 vs 1094
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1229 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1066 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 vs 111 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 251 vs 148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 vs 1094 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 310
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | NVIDIA NVS 310 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 178 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 251 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 337 | 431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 337 | 431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 583 | 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 583 | 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1094 | 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1094 | 1229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.974 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | NVIDIA NVS 310 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GF119 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 26 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1586 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 523 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 100.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4.184 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 156 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | 14 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |