AMD Radeon R5 230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1024 MB
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 131
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 1283
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 992 vs 835
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 992 vs 835
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 1155
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 2 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1024 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 vs 1283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 222
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 vs 439
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 vs 439
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 vs 439 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | 1283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 1155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Caicos | GF119 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1319 | 1626 |
Price now | $50 | $39.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | 10.13 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 292 million |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1024 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |