AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 427
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 15 February 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 427 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 vs 332
- 10.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 2.002
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 110.092
- 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 0.228
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 5.678
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 23.621
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 vs 332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 vs 2.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 vs 110.092 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 vs 0.228 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 vs 5.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 vs 23.621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 427 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 332 | 1693 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 770 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.002 | 21.658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 110.092 | 566.052 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.228 | 2.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.678 | 37.143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.621 | 98.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Caicos | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 15 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1125 | 1128 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |