AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 625

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
3964.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1074 vs 332
8.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 770
9.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 2.002
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 110.092
6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.228
5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 5.678
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 23.621

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 160
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1074 vs 332
Geekbench - OpenCL	6501 vs 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876 vs 2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556 vs 110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478 vs 0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22 vs 5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423 vs 23.621

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 208

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 730 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	545 vs 208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1074

332

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

208

545

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6501

770

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.876

2.002

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

322.556

110.092

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.478

0.228

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

32.22

5.678

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.423

23.621

Name	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	1074	332
PassMark - G2D Mark	208	545
Geekbench - OpenCL	6501	770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876	2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556	110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478	0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22	5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423	23.621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Polaris 24	Caicos
Launch date	13 May 2019	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1122	1125
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	775 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	160
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	6.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Floating-point performance		248.0 gflops
Transistor count		370 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Length		168 mm
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3