AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 M365X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M365X
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 23.04 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3x better floating-point performance: 737.3 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 772 vs 332
- 8.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6237 vs 770
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 772 vs 332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6237 vs 770 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M365X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M365X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | 174 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 332 | 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 770 | 6237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 110.092 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.228 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.621 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M365X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Caicos | Litho |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1102 | 1103 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 23.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |