AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon R7 350

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
4.1x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 512 vs 160
3.3x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
10.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7742 vs 770
12.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.507 vs 2.002
5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 110.092
11.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 vs 0.228
7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 5.678
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 23.621

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	6 July 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 160
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	7742 vs 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.507 vs 2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	647.813 vs 110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.719 vs 0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.6 vs 5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	109.558 vs 23.621

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 55 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7742

770

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.507

2.002

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

647.813

110.092

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.719

0.228

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.6

5.678

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

109.558

23.621

Name	AMD Radeon R7 350	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL	7742	770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.507	2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	647.813	110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.719	0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.6	5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	109.558	23.621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark		545
PassMark - G3D Mark		332

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 350	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Cape Verde	Caicos
Launch date	6 July 2016	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1099	1102
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	775 MHz
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	160
Texture fill rate	25.6 GTexel / s	6.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,500 million	370 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3