AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 281

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 667 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	545 vs 281

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

5.2x more texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
3.6x more pipelines: 576 vs 160
3.1x better floating-point performance: 768.4 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1356 vs 332
5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4467 vs 770
6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 vs 2.002
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 110.092
4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 vs 0.228
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.761 vs 5.678
Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.703 vs 23.621

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	32.02 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 vs 160
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	3008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1356 vs 332
Geekbench - OpenCL	4467 vs 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.383 vs 2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892 vs 110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.107 vs 0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.761 vs 5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.703 vs 23.621

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

545

281

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

332

1356

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

770

4467

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.002

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

110.092

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.228

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.678

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.621

40.703

Name	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G2D Mark	545	281
PassMark - G3D Mark	332	1356
Geekbench - OpenCL	770	4467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.002	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	110.092	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.228	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.678	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.621	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Caicos	GK106
Launch date	5 May 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1102	1105
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$84.95
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		10.91
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	248.0 gflops	768.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	160	576
Texture fill rate	6.2 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	370 million	2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	48.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3008 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus