AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 338

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 28 January 2014
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	545 vs 338

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 775 MHz
6x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 640 vs 160
4.8x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1616 vs 332
14.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 770
14x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 2.002
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 283.116 vs 110.092
9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 0.228
6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 5.678
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 23.621

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 160
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1616 vs 332
Geekbench - OpenCL	11041 vs 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.109 vs 2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	283.116 vs 110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.187 vs 0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.837 vs 5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.407 vs 23.621

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

545

338

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

332

1616

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

770

11041

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.002

28.109

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

110.092

283.116

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.228

2.187

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.678

33.837

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.621

91.407

Name	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM	AMD Radeon R9 M275X
PassMark - G2D Mark	545	338
PassMark - G3D Mark	332	1616
Geekbench - OpenCL	770	11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.002	28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	110.092	283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.228	2.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.678	33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.621	91.407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1705

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM	AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Code name	Caicos	Venus
Launch date	5 May 2015	28 January 2014
Place in performance rating	1095	1096
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	248.0 gflops	1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	160	640
Texture fill rate	6.2 GTexel / s	37 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt
Transistor count	370 million	1,500 million
Boost clock speed		925 MHz
Compute units		10
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	72 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore