AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 874 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 1367
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 513
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 513
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 677
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 677
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 1187
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 1187
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 874 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 vs 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 vs 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 1187 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 1367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 1187 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 351 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GF119 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1591 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 874 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 6.992 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 13.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |