AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 2902
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 1693
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 1693
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 18 June 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 vs 1693 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1106
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1106
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 3260
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3324 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF108 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1311 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
| Price now | $54.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9250
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8510G
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820A
