AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1024 MB
- 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 322
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 131
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 1283
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 2.471
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 77.99
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 0.233
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 6.018
- 18.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 4.053
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 555
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 835
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1677 vs 1155
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 555
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 835
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1677 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 2 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1024 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 vs 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 vs 1283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 vs 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 vs 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 vs 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 vs 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 vs 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 vs 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 1283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 1155 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GF119 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1626 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |